Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
54
CELH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$51.25
Seasonality move
:
112.8%
Day range:
$48.68 - $51.72
52-week range:
$21.10 - $66.74
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
564.80x
P/S ratio:
5.98x
P/B ratio:
11.00x
Volume:
6M
Avg. volume:
5.1M
1-year change:
75.82%
Market cap:
$13.2B
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
$0.09
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
|
$637.7M | $0.18 | 92.7% | -13.06% | $63.43 |
|
COCO
The Vita Coco Co., Inc.
|
$116.7M | $0.11 | -9.45% | 101.3% | $57.56 |
|
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
|
$4.4B | $0.59 | 6.96% | 18.86% | $34.13 |
|
KO
The Coca-Cola Co.
|
$12B | $0.56 | 6.38% | 10.39% | $79.61 |
|
MNST
Monster Beverage Corp.
|
$2B | $0.48 | 12.06% | 72.36% | $76.0455 |
|
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
|
$29B | $2.24 | 4.22% | 102.3% | $155.91 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
|
$51.34 | $63.43 | $13.2B | 564.80x | $0.00 | 0% | 5.98x |
|
COCO
The Vita Coco Co., Inc.
|
$54.22 | $57.56 | $3.1B | 46.90x | $0.00 | 0% | 5.32x |
|
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
|
$27.25 | $34.13 | $37B | 23.48x | $0.23 | 3.38% | 2.29x |
|
KO
The Coca-Cola Co.
|
$67.54 | $79.61 | $290.5B | 22.36x | $0.51 | 3.02% | 6.10x |
|
MNST
Monster Beverage Corp.
|
$76.1500 | $76.0455 | $74.4B | 43.35x | $0.00 | 0% | 9.38x |
|
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
|
$137.01 | $155.91 | $187.3B | 26.07x | $1.42 | 4.1% | 2.04x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
|
22.71% | -1.196 | 5.25% | 1.41x |
|
COCO
The Vita Coco Co., Inc.
|
4.37% | 0.971 | 0.61% | 2.53x |
|
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
|
40.98% | -0.733 | 51.63% | 0.27x |
|
KO
The Coca-Cola Co.
|
60.28% | -0.522 | 16.5% | 0.90x |
|
MNST
Monster Beverage Corp.
|
-- | -0.700 | -- | 2.63x |
|
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
|
72.4% | 0.163 | 24.97% | 0.68x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
|
$363.5M | $166.7M | 3.04% | 3.66% | 22.99% | $321.5M |
|
COCO
The Vita Coco Co., Inc.
|
$68.4M | $27.9M | 23.81% | 24.54% | 15.32% | $35.6M |
|
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
|
$2.2B | $954M | 3.75% | 6.38% | 22.16% | $527M |
|
KO
The Coca-Cola Co.
|
$7.7B | $4.1B | 17% | 44.72% | 32.3% | $4.6B |
|
MNST
Monster Beverage Corp.
|
$1.2B | $675.4M | 24.89% | 26.01% | 30.74% | $697.8M |
|
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
|
$12.9B | $3.9B | 10.76% | 38.53% | 16.11% | $3.5B |
Celsius Holdings, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CELH or COCO?
The Vita Coco Co., Inc. has a net margin of -8.42% compared to Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 13.17%. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.66% beat The Vita Coco Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 24.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.50.13% -$0.27 $3.8B COCOThe Vita Coco Co., Inc.37.54% $0.40 $338.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CELH or COCO?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.43, signalling upside risk potential of 23.55%. On the other hand The Vita Coco Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $57.56 which suggests that it could grow by 6.15%. Given that Celsius Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco Co., Inc., analysts believe Celsius Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than The Vita Coco Co., Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.12 4 0 COCOThe Vita Coco Co., Inc.7 3 0 -
Is CELH or COCO More Risky?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.890, which suggesting that the stock is 10.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Vita Coco Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or COCO?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Vita Coco Co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Vita Coco Co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or COCO?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $725.1M, which are larger than The Vita Coco Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $182.3M. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$61M is lower than The Vita Coco Co., Inc.'s net income of $24M. Notably, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 564.80x while The Vita Coco Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 46.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings, Inc. is 5.98x versus 5.32x for The Vita Coco Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.5.98x 564.80x $725.1M -$61M COCOThe Vita Coco Co., Inc.5.32x 46.90x $182.3M $24M
-
Which has Higher Returns CELH or KDP?
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has a net margin of -8.42% compared to Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 15.37%. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.66% beat Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.50.13% -$0.27 $3.8B KDPKeurig Dr Pepper, Inc.51% $0.49 $42.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CELH or KDP?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.43, signalling upside risk potential of 23.55%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $34.13 which suggests that it could grow by 25.26%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. is more attractive than Celsius Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.12 4 0 KDPKeurig Dr Pepper, Inc.7 6 0 -
Is CELH or KDP More Risky?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.890, which suggesting that the stock is 10.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. has a beta of 0.342, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.828%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or KDP?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Celsius Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. pays out 84.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or KDP?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $725.1M, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$61M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s net income of $662M. Notably, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 564.80x while Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings, Inc. is 5.98x versus 2.29x for Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.5.98x 564.80x $725.1M -$61M KDPKeurig Dr Pepper, Inc.2.29x 23.48x $4.3B $662M
-
Which has Higher Returns CELH or KO?
The Coca-Cola Co. has a net margin of -8.42% compared to Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 29.32%. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.66% beat The Coca-Cola Co.'s return on equity of 44.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.50.13% -$0.27 $3.8B KOThe Coca-Cola Co.61.57% $0.86 $80.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CELH or KO?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.43, signalling upside risk potential of 23.55%. On the other hand The Coca-Cola Co. has an analysts' consensus of $79.61 which suggests that it could grow by 17.87%. Given that Celsius Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Coca-Cola Co., analysts believe Celsius Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than The Coca-Cola Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.12 4 0 KOThe Coca-Cola Co.13 3 0 -
Is CELH or KO More Risky?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.890, which suggesting that the stock is 10.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Coca-Cola Co. has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.114%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or KO?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Coca-Cola Co. offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Celsius Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Coca-Cola Co. pays out 78.83% of its earnings as a dividend. The Coca-Cola Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or KO?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $725.1M, which are smaller than The Coca-Cola Co. quarterly revenues of $12.6B. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$61M is lower than The Coca-Cola Co.'s net income of $3.7B. Notably, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 564.80x while The Coca-Cola Co.'s PE ratio is 22.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings, Inc. is 5.98x versus 6.10x for The Coca-Cola Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.5.98x 564.80x $725.1M -$61M KOThe Coca-Cola Co.6.10x 22.36x $12.6B $3.7B
-
Which has Higher Returns CELH or MNST?
Monster Beverage Corp. has a net margin of -8.42% compared to Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 23.87%. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.66% beat Monster Beverage Corp.'s return on equity of 26.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.50.13% -$0.27 $3.8B MNSTMonster Beverage Corp.55.73% $0.53 $7.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CELH or MNST?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.43, signalling upside risk potential of 23.55%. On the other hand Monster Beverage Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $76.0455 which suggests that it could fall by -0.14%. Given that Celsius Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage Corp., analysts believe Celsius Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Monster Beverage Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.12 4 0 MNSTMonster Beverage Corp.11 8 1 -
Is CELH or MNST More Risky?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.890, which suggesting that the stock is 10.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage Corp. has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.861%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or MNST?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or MNST?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $725.1M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$61M is lower than Monster Beverage Corp.'s net income of $524.5M. Notably, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 564.80x while Monster Beverage Corp.'s PE ratio is 43.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings, Inc. is 5.98x versus 9.38x for Monster Beverage Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.5.98x 564.80x $725.1M -$61M MNSTMonster Beverage Corp.9.38x 43.35x $2.2B $524.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CELH or PEP?
PepsiCo, Inc. has a net margin of -8.42% compared to Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 10.94%. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.66% beat PepsiCo, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.50.13% -$0.27 $3.8B PEPPepsiCo, Inc.53.72% $1.90 $70.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CELH or PEP?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $63.43, signalling upside risk potential of 23.55%. On the other hand PepsiCo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $155.91 which suggests that it could grow by 13.79%. Given that Celsius Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, Inc., analysts believe Celsius Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than PepsiCo, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.12 4 0 PEPPepsiCo, Inc.4 15 2 -
Is CELH or PEP More Risky?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.890, which suggesting that the stock is 10.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo, Inc. has a beta of 0.417, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.254%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or PEP?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo, Inc. offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Celsius Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc. pays out 76.68% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or PEP?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $725.1M, which are smaller than PepsiCo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.9B. Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$61M is lower than PepsiCo, Inc.'s net income of $2.6B. Notably, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 564.80x while PepsiCo, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings, Inc. is 5.98x versus 2.04x for PepsiCo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.5.98x 564.80x $725.1M -$61M PEPPepsiCo, Inc.2.04x 26.07x $23.9B $2.6B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
70
RGC alert for Jan 8
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is down 21.5% over the past day.
Buy
64
RVMD alert for Jan 8
Revolution Medicines, Inc. [RVMD] is up 4.61% over the past day.
Sell
38
CRNX alert for Jan 8
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [CRNX] is down 0.23% over the past day.
